This breach leads to man-in-the-middle exploits, in which unsuspecting users' privacy and passwords could be compromised. The originating client uses a unique identifier in the message—its Media Access Control MAC address—as a sort of return address. If the network has multiple DHCP servers, the client typically responds to the first offer it receives.
At this point, the client is configured and able to communicate on the IP network. Pretty straightforward, right? This simplicity has helped to make DHCP the underlying protocol in the vast majority of networks around the world today. Other vendors have since created similar features in their operating systems.
DHCP snooping is built on the concept of using one or more trusted ports that have been identified as having legitimate DHCP servers attached. The network switch then filters any DHCP server messages from untrusted ports in order to protect the integrity of legitimate DHCP servers and their operation. Exporting this information is considered a best practice in case the Cisco switch unexpectedly reboots and loses all the data. It's important to note that Cisco's implementation of DHCP snooping also drops frames in which the source MAC doesn't match the embedded hardware address of the network interface card.
This practice is fairly common in data centers today, where much communication depends on a specific MAC address. Next, configure the VLANs you want to protect, using the command ip dhcp snooping vlan Finally, we need to tell the switch the port to which our trusted DHCP server is directly connected, as shown in Figure 4.
That's it for a basic configuration on a Cisco switch. To verify proper operation, use the IOS command show ip dhcp snooping as shown in Figure 5. More advanced configurations allow for exporting the DHCP bindings database and rate-limiting DHCP server responses, as well as manipulating which hardware addresses are used for verification. In the early days of networking, networks tended to be "flat," meaning that they had very few broadcast domains. In those days, DHCP servers could serve a large number of clients, because more hosts existed in larger broadcast domains.
The downside to this scenario is that larger broadcast domains become very inefficient as they scale to larger sizes, due to the broadcast nature of Ethernet. Network switches solved this issue by segmenting the networks into smaller chunks called virtual local area networks VLANs. DHCP Option 82 allows DHCP relay-agent information to be inserted so that policies can be applied to remote hosts in accordance with the network addressing schema.
Some vendors use these fields to implement their own extensions, and problems could arise if DHCP snooping is checking for specific values. Accordingly, Cisco devices can cause problems if these Option 82 fields don't match. To makes matters even more complicated, the behavior of whatever is inserted in these fields may change from one software release to another!
Understanding how Option 82 extensions are used will aid in troubleshooting scenarios where hosts are not being addressed properly. Typically DHCP snooping is enabled on switches that contain access ports. A best practice is to also enable rate-limiting of DHCP requests on the untrusted ports. It's enabled using this command:. I'd encourage anyone interested in deploying DHCP snooping in a production environment to test it in the lab first, to ensure a complete understanding of how the feature is intended to work.
In my experience, most network engineers are familiar with the general concepts of DHCP, but a far smaller number understand the details, especially when it comes to proprietary vendor extensions and how they're used. Interestingly, I could not find a vendor code for 24e6d7, so no clues there as to NIC or device manufacturer. Presumably the MAC address itself is software-based, and not registered to a manufacturer. There are any possible cisco switch remove — ip dhcp snooping trust itself?
Please help me this problem. Please i want to knew what these type means. It will thankful if you help me out on this. You should go to a Cisco support forum to find folks who can help you more quickly than I can. What traffic will DHCP snooping drop? DHCP server messages will be dropped if attempting to flow through a switchport that is not trusted. DHCP messages where the source MAC and embedded client hardware MAC do not match will also be dropped, although this protection can be defeated; badly written vendor IP implementations can cause this to happen with a surprising amount of frequency, the most common scenario being a DHCP request for one interface being forwarded through another interface on that same device.
DHCP snooping will also drop messages that release a lease or decline an offer, if the release or decline message is received on a switchport other than the port that the original DHCP conversation was held. This message indicates that the source frame and embedded client hardware address in a DHCP request differ, and seems to be unfortunately common. If you see these, consider investigating a few of them to verify that the issue is indeed a poor vendor DHCP client or IP forwarding implementation, and determine your policy going forward.
In other cases the Man-in-the-Middle attack can be used as a reconnaissance attack with the objective to obtain information about the network infrastructure, services but also identify hosts of high interest such as financial or database servers. It should be by now evident how a simple attack can become a major security threat for any organization. Rogue DHCP servers are a common problem within enterprise organizations and are not always directly related with an attack.
Rogue DHCP Servers tend to appear out of nowhere thanks to users who connect consumer-grade network devices to the network infrastructure unaware that they have connected an unauthorized device with a rogue DHCP server enabled.
The Rogue DHCP server then begins assigning IP addresses to hosts within the network therefore causing network connectivity problems and in many cases — major service disruptions.
In a best case scenario DHCP clients are served with an invalid IP address disconnecting them from the rest of the network. Worst case scenario would be the clients been assigned an IP address used by network infrastructure devices e. However, if the access switch was functioning only at layer two, we would have to designate our uplink interfaces as trusted interfaces by applying the command ip dhcp snooping trust to the layer two interfaces. This informs the switch that DHCP responses are allowed to arrive on those interfaces.
We can optionally enable one or more of these additional validation checks to achieve even more thorough security with the command ip arp inspection validate followed by the address type. The packets are consequently discarded by the switch, as evidenced by this log message:. We can see the drop counter begin to increase in the output of show ip arp inspection :. This is easily remedied by issuing the command no ip dhcp snooping information option in global configuration on the switch to disable the addition of option 82 to DHCP requests.
Check out this article by Internetwork Expert for more information. Great post on the two, although another word of caution To help myself, I wrote a little very basic Python-script, that compares the entries of the DHCP-snooping-bindings with the the arp-entries of the connected L3-switch. You can download the script on my blog.
The page is in german, but the script is pretty easy to use. Hi there, I really liked your article here.
0コメント